If You’re Disappointed with the 510(k) Process, Here Is Your Chance to Actually Influence the ProcessAugust 2010 – Alerts Life Sciences Practice Alert
On Tuesday, August 31, 2010, the Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) will host a live webinar to discuss the details of both reports and respond to any questions and concerns raised by the medical device community. To participate in the webinar, visit:
The FDA is now seeking additional public comments and input on the reports , especially on implementation feasibility and on potential alternatives.
Before You Can Help Yourself, You Must Know the Subject Well
The 1976 Medical Device Amendments to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act formally established jurisdiction by the FDA over medical devices, requiring premarket review and approval by the FDA by means of a 510(k) submission prior to any marketing of new products. Such review is for the purposes of making available to consumers devices that are safe and effective and fostering innovation in the medical device industry. “The 510(k) process was originally intended to ensure economic parity between post-enactment and pre-enactment devices.” Riegel v. Medtronic, 451 F.3d 104 (2d Cir. 2006).
Thirty-three years after the Amendments and the birth of the 510(k), in September 2009, CDRH convened an internal 510(k) Working Group that began a comprehensive assessment of the 510(k) process, being charged with evaluating the 510(k) program and exploring actions CDRH could take to strengthen the program and improve the constancy of its decision making, with a principal focus on actions the Center could take in the short term under its existing statutory authority. Another and independent assessment by the Institute of Medicine is expected to conclude in the summer of 2011. (Another recent CDRH Report is titled “Volume II: Task Force Utilization of Science in Regulatory Decision Making Preliminary Report and Recommendations.”)
Two open meetings earlier in 2010, plus comments entered into the dockets of each group, provided significant input for the reports.
What FDA Says It Is Trying to Achieve By the Review Process
- A rational, well-defined, and consistently interpreted review standard
- Well-informed decision making
- Continuous quality assurance
What You Should Do Now
- Immediately determine your company’s position on the issues to be discussed during the webinar.
- Be prepared to ask specific questions of the presenters.
- Gather and submit your company’s feedback regarding the draft reports to the FDA, by no later than October 4, 2010.
The Report, Volume I may be obtained at:
The Report, Volume II may be obtained at:
For more information about this Alert, contact Anton P. Ness at 610.397.7984 or [email protected] ; Christian Moffitt at 610.397.7973 or [email protected] ; Alfred J. Monte, Jr., chair of the firm's Life Science Practice Group, at 610.397.6514 or [email protected] ; or any other member of our Life Sciences Practice.