In the Zone

August 2011Newsletters

Download Issue (PDF File):

In this issue:

  • A Potential Increase in Traffic Is Not Enough To Defeat a Conditional Use Request - View Article
  • Case Summary: Northeast Pennsylvania SMSA Ltd. Partnership v. Scott Tp. Zoning Hearing Board - Height Relief for Cell Tower - View Article
  • Sign of the Times? Property Owner Cooked by Borough’s Sign Regulations - View Article
  • Commonwealth Court Addresses Right To Know Law Exceptions - View Article
  • A Note to Sellers - Is Your Mortgage a "Purchase Money Mortgage?"- View Article
  • Marcellus Shale Advisory Commission Releases Its Report - View Article
  • Commonwealth Court Rules Municipality's Failure To Record New Zoning Ordinance on Its Books Renders Ordinance Ineffective - View Article
  • Legislative Update in Pennsylvania - View Article
  • Possible Tax Windfall in Philadelphia County - If You Appeal - View Article
  • Case Summary: Pohlig Builders, LLC v. Zoning Hearing Board of Schuylkill Township - Variance To Allow Steep Slope Disturbance - View Article
  • Township’s Denial of Sewage Repair Permit Not Abuse of Discretion Where Inconsistent With Property Land Development Plans - View Article
  • Request for New Variance May Not Be Evaluated in Light of Prior Relief Granted by Zoning Board of Adjustment - View Article